Remember, the current defcon level warning system status today is not recorded as an actual official change until the United States government officially releases the actual current official warning system level for the military to the public. You may also visit the History Page where you will find a list of current official warning system status changes, including when the last warning system status change was for the U.S. The Condition Levels Page will explain what each of the defcon levels mean. “Therefore, the ‘nuclear 9/11’ in our future may be inevitable,” he added.More Information About The Defcon Level & Official U.S Military Change Historyįor more information about the levels and what the defense readiness levels mean visit our About Page where there is a section devoted to frequently asked questions and answers about the current defcon level alert warning status. Post-September 11, President Bush did a Japan, Korea, and China swing. “Nuclear victory is ‘unthinkable’ to most Americans, but not to Russia, China, and North Korea, whose totalitarian strategic cultures celebrate their nuclear weapons, parade mobile ICBMs, and play with nuclear fire in their diplomacy, brinkmanship, and plans for winning wars,” warned Pry. School I did a few years at New York Military Academy during seventh and eighth.
failed to prepare and said history could soon repeat. He listed several “close calls” when the U.S. Pry added, “Unfortunately, General Berrier is not the director of national intelligence.” “When he says something, we should listen very, very carefully and take him at his word,” said Defense Intelligence Agency Director Lt. She said, “We also have not observed forcewide nuclear posture changes that go beyond what we have seen in prior moments of heightened tensions during the last two decades.”īut he also drew attention to the top military intelligence chief at the same hearing raising concerns about Putin. He quoted congressional testimony this month from Avril Haines, director of National Intelligence, pooh-poohing Putin’s nuclear saber-rattling. In his latest paper, he is raising concerns about military complacency and the Democratic administration’s wish to look the other way when it comes to Putin’s threats. In that scenario, about 90% of the population would eventually die, he warned when he was chief of staff to the Congressional EMP Commission. Pry is well-known for his work on threats posed by electromagnetic weapons and has warned that they are an easy way for Russia to kill the lights on the East Coast for a year. nuclear posture would invite and reward a Russian surprise nuclear attack, adding a nuclear 9/11 or nuclear Pearl Harbor to the long and recent list of spectacular intelligence failures. nuclear forces remain at DEFCON 5 - their lowest readiness level,” he said in the report shared with Secrets. “White House and Pentagon officials claim that, despite Putin’s nuclear threats, there is no increased danger of nuclear war with Russia, so U.S. for too long has dismissed nuclear threats from Russia, North Korea, and Iran. But others are becoming more vocal in their call for raising it higher until the tensions visibly ease.Īnalyst Peter Pry, in a new white paper titled “The Nuclear 9/11 In Our Future,” is calling for heightened preparations while warning that the U.S.
0 kommentar(er)
